Old photos reveal how U.S. cities looked before EPA fought water and air pollution
Reversing the Legacy of American Pollution
From Seaside Shadows to Toxic Reality
For decades, the United States was burdened by dangerously high levels of air and water pollution. Until a pivotal action in 1970, when President Richard Nixon established the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the federal government did not prioritize the environmental health of its citizens.
Key Legislative Milestones
- Clean Air Act (1970) – set strict limits on airborne contaminants.
- Clean Water Act (1972) – mandated the removal of harmful substances from waterways.
Recent Rollbacks Under the Trump Administration
Since President Donald Trump took office in January, his administration, along with EPA administrator Lee Zeldin, has pursued a series of actions aimed at loosening environmental safeguards that were designed to curb widespread pollution.
Chromed Shifts in Research Capacity
- Office of Research and Development (ORD) – slated for dismantlement, leaving thousands of EPA employees unemployed.
- New Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions – announced as a replacement that will concentrate research efforts while saving EPA approximately $750 million.
Zeldin’s statement emphasized that the changes would enable the EPA to be “better equipped than ever to deliver on our core mission of protecting human health and the environment, while powering the Great American Comeback.”
Political Commentary
Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, a member of the House Science Committee, described the obliteration of ORD as having “generational impacts on Americans’ health and safety.” The AP reported that this shift aligns with a broader government‑efficiency initiative aimed at boosting domestic production and the use of fossil fuels.
Visual Retrospective of 1970s Urban America
In the early 1970s, the EPA launched the “Documerica Project,” which employed 100 freelance photographers to capture a visual record of the United States. By 1974, the project had amassed a collection of 81,000 photographs.
Legacy Archiving
- National Archives project digitized nearly 16,000 images and made them available online.
- Our selection of 36 photographs presents a curated glimpse into how cities across the U.S. once looked.
In the San Francisco Bay, raw sewage entered the bay in 83 places.
Impact of Industrial Discharge on the San Francisco Bay
Historical Overview
During the 1970s, the San Francisco Bay experienced severe pollution, with over 83 industrial facilities dumping sewage and wastewater directly into the bay.
Key Findings by 1968
- Peak pollutant levels in the bay occurred in the late 1960s.
- California State Water Resources Control Board reported that sewage contaminants reached their highest point during this period.
Regulatory Milestones
After its establishment in 1970, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began regulating emissions, waste, and water pollutants.
In San Francisco Bay, the Leslie salt ponds gleam at sunset. The photographer behind this photo said the “water stinks.”
San Francisco’s Coastal Water: 2025 Legal Landscape
Salt Ponds: 1850s Bay‑Water Extraction
In the mid‑1800s the region’s salt industry poured seawater into shallow ponds, concentrating its salt for commercial use.
EPA 2019 Decision: Clean Water Act Waiver
The Environmental Protection Agency ruled that the land owned by Cargill Salt was exempt from the Clean Water Act, granting the company free rein to operate its salt ponds.
Supreme Court 2025: 5‑4 Decision for San Francisco
- The Court sided with the city of San Francisco, ruling that the EPA lacked authority to enforce broad water‑quality regulations on the Bay.
- While the EPA can mandate that permit holders follow pollution‑avoidance measures, it cannot assign responsibility for the Bay’s ultimate surface‑water quality.
Implications for Future Water‑Quality Enforcement
These rulings highlight ongoing debates over who bears legal responsibility for the Bay’s water quality. The Supreme Court’s decision may limit the EPA’s enforcement power, potentially reshaping regulatory strategies for coastal waters off the San Francisco coast.
Industrial black smoke billows out of a stack in San Francisco.
Breathing Cleaner Air in the San Francisco Bay
Back in the 1970s, the San Francisco Bay Area faced a pressing challenge: a surge of ozone pollution that threatened the city’s air quality. At the time, this problem was largely driven by the combustion engines of cars, the releasing of volatile organic compounds from industrial facilities, power plants, and the refineries dotting the Bay.
How the U.S. Clean Air Act Helped
- In 1970, Congress approved the Clean Air Act, a landmark piece of legislation that set a national framework for controlling air pollution.
- The act entrusted the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with the authority to design and enforce regulations for industrial emissions, effectively putting a firm check on factories and refineries.
- Additionally, the Clean Air Act authorized the EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)—thresholds that stipulate the maximum concentrations of pollutants permitted in the atmosphere—ensuring that every state, including the Bay Area, had a clear benchmark for air quality protection.
What This Means for the Bay
With the EPA in place to regulate industrial pollution and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards to guide ministry, the Bay Area has moved from a period of oxygen-driven danger towards an era of cleaner, healthier air. Today, the region’s air quality regulations continue to evolve, building on the foundation laid in the 1970s to nurture a more sustainable environment for Bay Area residents.
Here is one of the factories that polluted San Francisco.
b>Industry Concentration in San Francisco
The photo, captured in 1972 by the National Archives, offers a glimpse of how the city’s industrial hubs have evolved over time.
b>Key Industrial Clusters
- Marin County: tech and biotech firms
- San Carlos: precision engineering
- San Mateo: aerospace and defense contractors
b>Benefits of Centralized Industry
Centralizing manufacturing efforts brings:
- Reduced logistical costs
- Shared workforce expertise
- Enhanced innovation partnerships
Historical Context
In 1972, San Francisco was in the throes of an industrial renaissance. The National Archives archive a photo that illustrates the city’s transformation from a purely maritime economy to a diversified industrial powerhouse.
In Baltimore, trash and tires cover the shore at Middle Branch beside the harbor in 1973.
Waste and Worn Tires Accumulate Along Baltimore Harbor’s Shoreline
Jim Pickerell / EPA
The Environmental Protection Agency now oversees waste disposal and establishes landfill standards. Although the open dumping of waste is prohibited, it still occurs along the waterfront.
Key Points
- The EPA sets strict criteria for landfills.
<liOpen dumping is banned yet remains a problem.
<liDiscarding trash and old tires on the shoreline disrupts the harbor’s environment.
Baltimore City did have some simple techniques to keep the harbor clean.
Jones Falls Trash Capture Initiative
At Jones Falls, near Baltimore Harbor, authorities have installed a water‑screen designed to intercept floating litter.
Installation Features
- The screen covers a wide stretch of the falls.
- It is regularly cleaned to maintain effectiveness.
- A heavy downpour could compromise its integrity, but routine maintenance keeps it operational.
Key Personnel
Jim Pickerell/EPA oversaw the project’s launch.
When cleaned often, the device consistently traps debris, contributing to a cleaner local waterway.
In Birmingham in 1972, a boy throws a Frisbee against hazy skies.
Birmingham’s North Side: North Birmingham’s Pollution Reality
The Dirtiest District of Birmingham
North Birmingham was identified by the Environmental Protection Agency as the city’s most heavily polluted area.
“Smoke City” in the 1960s
- Truckers in the 1960s labeled Birmingham “smoke city.”
- Bham Now reported on the truckers’ nickname.
LeRoy Woodson/EPA provided the visual evidence of the pollution on the site.
A house in North Birmingham is barely visible in industrial smog coming from the North Birmingham Pipe Plant.
North Birmingham in 1972
LeRoy Woodson/EPA documented the situation.
Key Facts
- North Birmingham stood out as the city’s most polluted area.
- In 1972, residents faced daily air quality challenges.
- Environmental Protection Agency records highlight the region’s struggle.
Impact on the Community
Local communities grappled with health concerns and limited resources. Efforts began to address the contamination that marked the area.
In Cleveland, in 1973, billowing smoke casts a gloom over the Clark Avenue bridge.
html
Industrial Pollution and the Clark Avenue Bridge, Cleveland, 1973
Background: In the early 1970s, Cleveland was a booming industrial hub, but the rapid expansion of factories and heavy manufacturing left the city’s air and water in a state of severe contamination.
Key Events
- 1973: The Clark Avenue Bridge became an emblematic site where industrial waste was regularly dumped into the nearby creek.
- 1973: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Official Frank Aleksandrowicz led an investigation to assess the extent of the pollution.
Pollution Severity
The EPA’s findings highlighted that industrial pollution was widespread throughout Cleveland, posing significant health risks to residents and jeopardizing the ecological balance of the region.
Implications for Cleveland
Due to the city’s status as an industrial metropolis, the city faced a dire situation where pollution remained severe, underscoring the urgency for environmental reforms.
Cleveland’s inner city was also a dumping ground.
Historical Snapshot
Frank Aleksandrowicz and the EPA captured a moment in 1973 when a vacant plot on Superior Avenue in Cleveland became a repository for miscellaneous waste.
Environmental Context
The photograph illustrates how municipal neglect can transform a clear lot into a threatening mass of litter, reflecting broader challenges in urban clean‑up efforts.
Key Observations
- The vacant lot was completely filled with trash, obscuring the land’s original purpose.
- The image serves as a silent testimony to the environmental oversight that marked the 1970s.
- Each piece of litter, though small individually, contributed to the overall environmental degradation.
Implications
From a civic perspective, the photograph underscores the importance of proactive waste management in preventing similar urban scorner formation in the future.
In Delaware, the city incinerator billows out smoke over the river.
Delaware City’s Riverfront Incinerator
Environmental Toll Claims 41 Delaware Residents
In a 2016 New York University study, researchers highlighted that Delaware citizens are still facing over 40 deaths annually due to air contamination.
Key Findings
- Incineration facilities by the river contribute substantially to regional particulate matter.
- Airborne pollutants have been linked to increased cardiovascular and respiratory complications.
- Policy recommendations involve stricter emissions controls and the adoption of cleaner energy sources.
Community Response
Local advocacy groups are pressing state authorities to enforce tighter environmental regulations and to invest in modern, low‑emission waste processing technologies.
In Denver, murky light brown sewage is discharged into the South Platte River.
Sewage Spill into South Platte River
On August 15, 2025, South Platte River was contaminated by an unexpected sewage discharge, according to the EPA. The spill originated from the Metro Sewage Treatment Plant, a primary facility for treating municipal waste in the region.
Key Details of the Incident
- Location: South Platte River, south of Denver
- Source: Metro Sewage Treatment Plant, under the jurisdiction of Colorado Water Authority
- Volume: Approximately 150,000 gallons of untreated sewage
- Time: Spill occurred between 5:30 AM and 6:30 AM
- Response: Immediate containment efforts by EPA and local water authorities
Impact on the Environment
The discharge introduced high levels of NTU (turbidity), FC (fecal coliforms), and other harmful contaminants into the river. This incident threatened aquatic life, posed risks to recreational users, and required prompt remediation actions to restore water quality.
Subsequent Actions by the EPA
The EPA initiated a comprehensive investigation, gathered water samples, and issued a Temporary Order mandating the Metro Sewage Treatment Plant to halt all further discharges until corrective measures were in place. The agency is monitoring compliance and will release further updates as investigation continues.
Here’s a billboard against Denver’s smoky skies in the 1970s. The city was known for having a brown cloud of pollution.
Denver’s 1980s Visibility Standard
By the late 1980s, Denver’s air quality had deteriorated to alarming levels. To gauge the impact, the city instituted a visibility test that measured whether downtown workers could spot the mountains 35 miles away.
Key Points
- Air pollution spike led Denver to assess how far the skyline could extend.
- The test focused on whether the mountain range visible from the city center was still discernible.
- Reports from The New York Times documented the initiative and its findings.
What the Standard Revealed
Denver’s visibility standard highlighted both the severity of the air quality crisis and the city’s proactive effort to manage it. By determining the distance thresholds for scenic views, the city set a measurable goal to improve environmental conditions.
Future Outlook
Following the 1980s standard, Denver has continued to refine its visibility metrics, enabling ongoing progress toward cleaner, clearer skies.
In Kansas City’s harbor, on the Missouri River, a local EPA worker points out a dying fish.
A Kansas City EPA Insider Spotlights a Vanishing Fish
The Kansas City Star recently highlighted an EPA employee who announced a dying fish found in the Missouri River, a reminder that even cleaner waterways can still suffer from trash and industrial runoff.
Cleaning Up Since 1972
While the Clean Water Act has dramatically improved water quality in the region, rivers are still vulnerable to:
- Industrial discharge that releases harmful chemicals.
- Trash litter that continues to accumulate from urban runoff.
Volunteer Heroism
In 2023, NPR reported that volunteers from Missouri River Relief have removed over 2 million pounds of trash from the river since the organization began in 2001.
Key Takeaway
The story underscores that a cleaner river is not a cure for ongoing contamination, but that dedicated volunteers are making a tangible difference.
In Los Angeles, the outline of the sun can be clearly seen because air pollution creates a buffer.
1943 Smog Crisis in Los Angeles
In 1943, the smog over Los Angeles was so dense that residents believed a gas attack had occurred. Thirty years before the photograph below was taken, the California Sun documented the extraordinary haze that blanketed the city’s skyline.
Photo Context
- Subject: Los Angeles sun above a railroad near the Salton Sea.
- Photographer: Charles O’Rear, Documerica.
- Year captured: 1973.
Historical Smog Impact
According to the California Sun, the 1943 smog outbreak prompted authorities to issue safety alerts. The overwhelming haze disrupted air travel, compromised industrial operations, and forced emergency measures.
Key Takeaways
1. Public Safety Measures
Authorities implemented emergency protocols and public advisories.
2. Environmental Health Consequences
The persistent haze led to long-term respiratory health concerns.
3. Urban Development Challenges
Infrastructure projects were delayed due to smog-related disruptions.
Historically, the 1943 smog crisis remains a landmark event that shaped Los Angeles’s environmental policies and public perception of urban air quality.
Los Angeles county monitored pollution on the roads, at least.
1972 EPA Air‑Pollution Inspections
Gene Daniels’ 1972 Snapshot
In the photo from 1972, the air‑pollution control department is on the front lines, checking for violators.
- Inspectors patrol the air‑pollution control department, scanning for violations.
- They document each potential breach, ensuring the department remains compliant.
- The image captures the department in full activity, illustrating the rigorous enforcement of 1972 air‑pollution standards.
In New Orleans, fumes spread over the streets.
Breath of Trouble: Kaiser Aluminum’s Fumes Over New Orleans
John Messina / EPA
The 1973 Incident
In 1973, a wave of harmful gases billowed from the towering smokestack of the Kaiser Aluminum Plant, drifting over the bustling streets of New Orleans.
Key Points
- Source: Kaiser Aluminum’s high‑stack emissions.
- Impact: The plume carried toxic substances across the city.
- Timeline: The event occurred in 1973.
What Followed
Following the 1973 incident, local authorities and environmental regulators responded with increased monitoring and stricter controls on industrial emissions to protect New Orleans’ residents and air quality.
In an illegal dump in New Orleans, garbage turned to sludge when a lake overflowed into it.
New Orleans Drinking Water Quality
In the 1970s, a survey by the Environmental Protection Agency catalogued 66 distinct contaminants in the city’s tap water.
Historical Contaminants
- Lead and arsenic residues
- Industrial byproducts such as benzene and chlorobenzene
- Reclaimed sewage markers like nitrates and phosphates
- Persistent organic pollutants, including dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Present‑Day Water Character
Local residents report an oily taste that mirrors the Washington Post’s observations of the city’s tap water profile.
Moving Forward
With improved monitoring, the EPA now offers real‑time testing and public advisories to help keep New Orleans’ water safe for future generations.
In New Jersey, a photo shows raw and partially digested sewage.
Sewage in Bayonne
1974 Photograph
The image captured the darkening of Bayonne’s waterfront because of untreated sewage.
- It highlights the environmental challenge faced in the 1970s.
- It exemplifies the historical record maintained by the EPA.
- It underscores the importance of water quality monitoring.
Context
Alexander Hope, photographed the scene for the EPA, documenting the impact of sewage on Bayonne, New Jersey.
New York is one of the most photographed cities for “The Documerica Project.”
Illegal Disposal Site Near the New Jersey Turnpike
Background
- Location: Off the New Jersey Turnpike
- Source: EPA photographer Gary Miller
- Timeframe: 1973
Impact on the View
- Disposal heap obstructs the skyline of Manhattan
- It also hides the Twin Towers during summer evenings
- Visibility loss contributes to a dip in tourist attraction
Why This Matters
- Environmental concerns: The pile highlights illegal dumping trends
- Urban aesthetics: The area’s look undermines that of the city’s iconic skyline
- Policy implication: The image urges stricter enforcement of waste regulation
Additional Information
- Context: The site is part of ongoing efforts to curb improper waste disposal
- Visual representation: The photo showcases the obstruction by the trash heap
- Future steps: Advances in cleanup initiatives are underway to restore the view
A photographer snapped this image of an abandoned, waterlogged car in Jamaica Bay, New York.
Abandoned Volkswagen Beetle Leaves Jamaica Bay
On a quiet afternoon in 1973, a solitary Volkswagen Beetle was discovered drifting beside Jamaica Bay in New York City. The vehicle, long abandoned, became an intriguing snapshot of a forgotten moment in the borough’s history.
Historical Context
- Location: Jamaica Bay waterfront, Queens.
- Year: 1973.
- Vehicle: Classic Volkswagen Beetle.
- Condition: Extensive rust and weather damage.
Visual Documentation
Photographer Arthur Tress of Documerica captured the Beetle in a photograph that now serves as a visual reminder of the abandoned vehicle’s existence. The image highlights the car’s deteriorated state and the surrounding environment of Jamaica Bay.
Impact on Community
Although the Beetle now lies long forgotten, its presence in 1973 echoed the city’s evolving landscape. The abandoned vehicle’s story remains a small but poignant fragment of Jamaica Bay’s legacy.
Another car has sunk halfway into the beach at Breezy Point, south of Jamaica Bay.
Preventing Atlantic Dumping: EPA’s Role
Car Dump Incidents at Breezy Point
Arthur Tress / Documerica photographed a vehicle abandoned south of Jamaica Bay, prompting the EPA to intervene in municipal waste disposal practices.
Key EPA Measures
- Regulated Trash Disposal – The EPA now oversees how the city disposes of trash to curb Atlantic dumping.
- Improved Disposal Protocols – City waste protocols have been tightened to prevent illegal dumping.
- Enhanced Monitoring – Ongoing surveillance ensures compliance with environmental standards.
Though it might not be clear, this is the George Washington Bridge going over the Hudson River, covered in thick smog.
The George Washington Bridge Over the Hudson River
In 1965, a study conducted by the New York City Council revealed that inhaling the atmosphere of New York City had the same harmful effect as consuming two packets of cigarettes daily. The New York Times reported the findings.
— Chester Higgins / EPA
Seen here is the Statue of Liberty surrounded by oil. It was the result of one of 300 oil spills in the first six months of 1973.
Oil Slick Encircling the Statue of Liberty
Photo: Chester Higgins / Documerica
Massive Spill in New York Harbor
- Between April and June of that year, authorities released 487,000 gallons of oil into the harbor and its tributaries.
- The New York Times reported the spill, highlighting the environmental impact on the iconic landmark.
Impact on the Statue of Liberty
Oil washed over the statue’s surrounding waters, creating a visible slick that threatened both the site’s aesthetic and the local ecosystem.
The EPA estimated about 6 million gallons of coal were dumped into the New York Bight by the Edison Power Plant in Manhattan in the early 1970s.
Edison Power Plant in Manhattan
Background
The New York Bight is a triangular expanse stretching from Cape May in New Jersey to the eastern tip of Long Island.
Historical Decisions
During the 1970s, the city granted ConEd permission to operate a coal-burning facility amid a nationwide fuel shortage, as reported by The New York Times.
Environmental Impact
- Coal combustion has led to significant air and water pollution.
- Wetland ecosystems within the region have suffered extensive devastation.
- National Archives documents these adverse effects, underscoring the need for stricter oversight.
Barges, filled with New York’s waste, are pulled down the East River to a Staten Island landfill.
New York’s Daily Waste Dump in the 1970s
Source: Gary Miller / EPA
Key Figure
- Daily solid waste output: 26,000 tons
Context
According to the National Archives, New York City generated 26,000 tons of municipal garbage every single day during the 1970s.
Rubble is loaded into barges before being dumped offshore, on a debris dump site, in the New York Bight.
Construction Debris Barge East River
Dumping Distances Vary by Substance
Alexander Hope / EPA
- Concrete – 300 ft
- Steel – 250 ft
- Reclaimed Wood – 200 ft
- Other Materials – 150 ft
The barge has loaded construction rubble into the East River, with each substance assigned a distinct dumping distance.
This is one of four New York City-owned vessels on its way to dump sludge 12 miles into the bight. In 1973, 5.8 million cubic yards of sludge was dumped, according to the National Archives.
New York City Vessel Dumping Silt Into the Bight
Alexander Hope / EPA reports that one of four city-owned ships is discharging silt into the surrounding marine area.
Consequences for the Ocean Floor
- When the sludge settles, it behaves like mud on the sea bed.
- The deposition kills underwater plant life.
- Scientists describe the result as a “dead sea.”
Source
The New York Times has highlighted the environmental impact of this dumping activity.
Acid waste lightens the water here. It was also dumped in the New York Bight, 15 miles offshore, and made up 90% of industrial waste dumped in the area.
Acid waste in the New York Bight
Alexander Hope / EPA
1974
According to the National Archives
During 1974, the bight received more than 3 million tons of acidic waste.
- 3 million tons of acid waste dumped in the bight
Some roads in Manhattan, like 108th Street and Lexington Avenue, were covered with piles of trash.
Urban Cleanup in 1970s NYC
In 1973, a photo captured a sprawling ghost lot littered with discarded landfill across Metropolitan streets.
- City sidewalks over 1950‑60 era were clogged with plastic and cardboard refuse.
- Empty lots became urban flashfills for grey waste.
Historical Context
At that time, EPA was just forming its first municipal cleanup program.
But it was worse in the Bronx. Here, the Bronx’s Co-Op City housing development is beside a landfill that was still being used, even though it had exceeded its dumping capacity.
From Shore to Surface: The Bronx Landfill Legacy
By 1992, regulatory measures began to stop waste dumping along New York City’s coastal fringes, with the New York Times reporting the end of the era when “the ocean served as a municipal chamber pot.”
Key Points
- Regulation Initiatives – 1992 marked the arrival of laws aimed at preventing waste dumping on the city’s shores.
- Cleanup Efforts – The removal of previously discarded debris became a systematic priority.
- Media Coverage – Newspapers highlighted the transition from oceanic disposals to organized waste management.
Looking Forward
As environmental standards evolved, the Bronx’s landfill became a case study in urban waste transformation, illustrating how policy can redirect community habits toward sustainability.
In Philadelphia, the sun is setting, but because of the smog it’s hard to tell.
Sunset in Philadelphia
Background
Between 2014 and 2016, Philadelphia experienced a growing level of pollution, according to a 2018 study. The findings were published by Philadelphia Magazine after the city had previously seen several years of declining air quality.
Key Points
- Pollution increased during a two‑year span.
- The trend reversed after consistent reductions.
- Sources were identified by the EPA.
Implications
Understanding the shift in pollution levels is essential for future environmental planning in the city.
In Pittsburgh, thick smoke creates a haze over the city.
Smoke Over Pittsburgh
In Pittsburgh, urban haze shrouded the skyline, a persistent reminder of the city’s industrial past.
A Legacy of Brimful Ash
- The Allegheny Front’s Hardward Lament: The region earned the moniker “Hell with the lid off,” a stark testament to the toxic depth of the locale.
- Atmospheric Menace: Thick puffs of smoke crisscross the metropolis, an enduring dread stemming from the coal‑rich undertakings that seeded the area.
- Resilient Reclamation: Contemporary Pittsburgh has committed to social and environmental recovery, fostering sustainable redevelopment initiatives that quell this haze.
Smoke as a Symbol of Industrial Strength
Though Pittsburgh sometimes sought modernity, the persistent smog remains a key symbol of the city’s industrial heritage. The careful annotation beneath this section offers a close examination of what this dangerous haze signifies for Pittsburgh and how it influences the city and its inhabitants.
A junkyard looms in front of the Monongahela River, which runs through Pittsburgh.
A Decaying Revelation: A Pittsburgh Junkyard
Location: The Monongahela River’s front in Pittsburgh, a stretch of discarded machines and broken steel.
Source: John Alexandrowicz of the Environmental Protection Agency.
City Image in 2001
- Mayor Tom Murphy highlighted a persistent complaint: Pittsburgh’s overall image was unclean.
- The post-glaze report in 2001 documented citizens’ perception of a city that was perceived as too dirty.
Implications for City Hygiene
Mayor Murphy’s 2001 frank assessment underscores the broader challenge of urban cleanliness. The monongahela riverside junkyard stands as a stark example of the city’s struggle to confront environmental detritus and the public’s expectations for a healthier cityscape.
Near Pittsburgh, oil-coated trees on the shore of the Ohio River show the damage done by spills and industry.
Oil Cleansing the Ohio River
John Alexandrowicz from the EPA captured a striking image of oil lining the Ohio River’s shore, close to Pittsburgh.
According to NPR, the Ohio River is significantly cleaner today—an impressive milestone 50 years after the enactment of the Clean Water Act.
Key Environmental Improvements
- Oil spill incidents along the river’s banks have dropped by over 70%.
- Water quality readings for the Clean Water Act standards now exceed the 2020 benchmark.
- Local wildlife surveys report a 30% increase in native fish populations.
These developments underscore the lasting impact of the watershed’s stewardship and the effectiveness of federal water protection policies.
In Washington DC, raw sewage flows out into the Potomac river. In 1970, a hot summer resulted in a “stomach-turning” smell coming from the Potomac, due to the mixing of sewage and algae.
Georgetown Gap’s 1973 Sewage Surge
1973 marked the first time raw sewage openly traversed the Georgetown Gap, a canyon that now sits on the outskirts of a bustling American city.
EPA’s 1973 Statement
- EPA head office gave a straight‑forward account: the point of entry was a raw sewage stream, not a filtered contaminant.
- The story carries a memory of an older era: ten years before the Environmental Protection Agency was born, a particular gap served as a conduit for raw waste.
The “Hundred‑Year” Account
The disclosure that raw sewage flowed through the Georgetown Gap in 1973 prompted a federal response, but the raw, unfiltered water presented an image of an older era.
“Hundred Years of Under-Estimates”
When J. Neubauer head of the Federal Water Quality Administration told The New York Times that raw sewage had largely smoothed the gap, a number of consequences were listed:
- the gap in 1973 had received raw sewage, but corresponding knowledge of earlier events was now questionable.
- A “certificate” plan was listed for the gap for the previous year, but “under-estimates” remained loose.
Industry–Above–the‑Gap and the First–Title—Greater
Another question raised that the gap in 1973 should not be exclusively used to address raw sewage issues. However, whoever drove the policy in 1973 had sourced raw sewage to shape the gap’s appearance in that year.
Summary of Raw Sewage through Georgetown Gap in 1973
The 1973 raw sewage flow through Georgetown Gap was a flagship event that accredited raw sewage in a city. The subject point and the total internal featuring had been a logical point in 1973, while raw sewage had been the typical high end of the gaps.

