AI vs jobs: The cluelessness at breaking point again.

AI vs jobs: The cluelessness at breaking point again.

The EU AI Law Under Scrutiny

The Stagnation in the Future of Work

  • 2030 is the target year for whatever disruption the EU has planned.
  • “Disruption” once signified business upheaval; it now merely describes a decade of costly, unproductive destruction across all business sectors.
  • The naive belief that a simple calculator can oversee trillions in finance persists, fueling frustration in the tech world.
  • Daily AI Errors and Job Creation

  • AI misfires are routine, yet these errors spawn new jobs dedicated to troubleshooting.
  • However, the financial cost of fixing these mishaps may erode personal wealth in the process.
  • Fraud in Global Finance

  • Fraudulent scams involve fictitious investment options created by nonexistent businesses that appear authentic and registered.
  • Offshore operations mean investors have zero chance of retrieving their funds.
  • Even the simplest fake transaction wall attacks real markets, creating opportunities for job seekers to repair these problems.
  • Legal Liability for AI Providers

  • No clear legal liabilities exist for AI service providers or resellers, despite discussions about AI insurance.
  • The US “Big Idiotic Bill” prevents state regulation for 10 years, opening the door for fraudsters.
  • Targeted Solutions

  • Solutions must target civil law and impose strong deterrents for fraud.
  • AI providers must be liable for fraud, even if unwitting, and social media should protect itself against deepfakes and fraud with appropriate Terms of Service.
  • Advertisers should demand proof of legitimate business before distributing commercial content.
  • Private Contract Law as a Model

  • These measures do not require regulatory innovation; they resemble private contract law.
  • The next wave of jobs will revolve around managing these AI “brats” and their alleged human accomplices.
  • The Leadership Four Words

  • “Get on with it.”
  • Do it.
  • Disclaimer*
  • The opinions expressed in this Op‑Ed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of the Digital Journal or its members.